Picture this: it’s Monday morning. Your e-commerce site is running a “48-hour flash sale.” Orders are flying in, payments are processing, and your support team is unusually quiet — a beautiful thing.
Then, suddenly, Slack explodes.
-
“Checkout is stuck on spinning…”
-
“Order confirmations aren’t going out.”
-
“Inventory looks wrong.”
-
“Why are refunds queued for hours?”
At first, everything looks healthy: CPU is fine, your web servers are up, and the database graphs don’t show anything dramatic. But the system still feels… frozen.
After 45 minutes of firefighting, you find the real culprit: RabbitMQ. A few queues ballooned, consumers slowed down, acknowledgements backed up, and memory hit the high watermark. RabbitMQ started applying flow control, publishers began timing out, and your business logic quietly stopped moving messages through critical workflows.
This is exactly why RabbitMQ monitoring isn’t optional. If RabbitMQ is the “circulatory system” of your architecture, then monitoring is the heart monitor that tells you something is wrong before the patient collapses.
